Previous Next

• 08-21-2008, 3:32 PM

  Arthurbw Joined on 07-21-2003, 2:56 PM Posts 12	site vs global urlscan presendence Reply Contact with urlscan v3 if you have both global settings and site level settings the site level takes presendence, right?

• 08-21-2008, 4:10 PM

  In reply to

  ksingla Joined on 06-14-2006, 3:02 AM Redmond, WA Posts 561	Re: site vs global urlscan presendence Reply Contact See if site filter section of this article answers your question. I think both global and site filter will run independently and will reject a request if it is not allowed by configuration of global filter or site filter. Thanks, Kj

• 08-25-2008, 3:02 PM

  In reply to

  Arthurbw Joined on 07-21-2003, 2:56 PM Posts 12	Re: site vs global urlscan presendence Reply Contact that article did not answer my question but from what you said it sounds like the most restrictive filter is what will reject the request.  so if we allowed site filters we would not want to have the global filter more restrictive than the site filter.

• 08-27-2008, 6:11 PM

  In reply to

  ytkaczyk Joined on 05-19-2007, 5:34 PM Posts 5	Re: site vs global urlscan presendence Reply Contact  Yes both filters are ran and so the end result is that the most restrictive rules are applied.  Yves